Community and contribution

Help make EAINE useful, credible, and trusted.

Question weak assumptions, share non-confidential evidence, and improve practical guidance. Every accepted change should be open to review.

ContributeHow evidence works
Open contribution systemFrom challenge to public learning
  1. 01ChallengeIdentify the weak assumption
  2. 02EvidenceAdd context and limits
  3. 03ResolveRecord the decision
  4. 04PublishImprove reusable guidance
Shared outcomeInspectable change + attributed learning

Contribution paths

Your experience can improve a specific part of EAINE.

Choose the role closest to your knowledge. A useful contribution can be a question, correction, example, challenge, or evidence.

  1. 01Challenge

    Framework reviewer

    Find unclear, incomplete, or weak ideas before they become accepted guidance.

  2. 02Ground

    Field practitioner

    Share what worked, what failed, and what changed in a real implementation.

  3. 03Examine

    Architecture reviewer

    Test platform boundaries, control points, identity, knowledge, agents, and observability.

  4. 04Strengthen

    Governance reviewer

    Improve risk decisions, human authority, transparency, evidence, and audit readiness.

  5. 05Clarify

    Book reviewer

    Make the narrative, examples, exercises, and learning journey more useful to readers.

  6. 06Teach

    Student / educator

    Test whether EAINE can be understood, taught, applied, and assessed fairly.

Review integrity

Open contribution works best when everyone follows clear rules.

  1. 01Challenge ideas without attacking people.
  2. 02Separate evidence, interpretation, recommendation, and hypothesis.
  3. 03State context and limits when sharing field experience.
  4. 04Protect confidential, personal, regulated, and client information.
  5. 05Disclose meaningful conflicts of interest.
  6. 06Accept that contribution does not guarantee adoption into the EAINE body of knowledge.

Participate now

Choose the right channel and start contributing.

Public work should remain non-confidential. GitHub private vulnerability reporting is the temporary confidential route while monitored EAINE mailboxes are established.

02

Research and evidence

Propose sources, standards, studies, and non-confidential field evidence in a reviewable record.

Request research access
03

Framework contribution

Propose a documented improvement while the broader community channels are being established.

Request repository access
04

Private security or privacy concern

Use the repository's confidential reporting route; never place sensitive details in a public issue.

Report privately

Never send confidential, personal, regulated, client, or credential information through a public issue.